Skip to content

A randomized comparison of three analgesic technique for clavicle fracture surgery; cervical plexus block vs interscalene block vs combined cervical plexus and interscalene block

A randomized comparison of three analgesic technique for clavicle fracture surgery cervical plexus block vs interscalene block vs combined cervical plexus and interscalene block

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0003635
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-03-18
Start date
2019-03-25
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : single injection cervical plexus block (0.5% ropivacaine 10 mL), interscalene block (0.5% ropivacaine 5 mL), or combined cervical plexus and interscalene block (0.5% ropivacaine 15

Sponsors

Inha University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients sceduled for clavicle fracture surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Body mass index > 35 kg/m2 contraindication to regional anesthesia severe respiratory disease allergy to study medication pregnancy neuropathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
pain score at post-anesthesia care uinit;supplemantal analgesia;supplemantal analgesia;complication;satisfaction;block duration

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
pain score at 24h after surgery

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactChunwoo Yang

Inha University Hospital

everycw@daum.net+82-32-890-3968

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026