Skip to content

A comparative study of hemolysis of intravenous blood collection methods in ER

A comparative study of hemolysis of intravenous blood collection methods in emergency service

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0003537
Enrollment
253
Registered
2019-02-20
Start date
2019-02-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Hanyang University Guri Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients visited Hanyang University Guri Hospital who needed blood tests in the emergency room and needed IV catheter maintenance for blood sampling and fluid / medicine treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ? Visit the emergency room ? Blood test ? Receive IV or IV treatment through IV line. If any of the above items fall into 'No', they are excluded from this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Hemolysis/coagulation of blood sample drawed through straight needle+flexible catheter and flexible catheter only

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Hemolysis/coagulation of blood sample compared by blood sampling location;Hemolysis/coagulation of blood sample compared by tourniquet location;Hemolysis/coagulation of blood sample compared by;Hemolysis/coagulation of blood sample compared by difficulty of blood sampling;Hemolysis/coagulation of blood sample compared by syringe size

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactInhye Lee

Hanyang University Guri Hospital

sugardiamond@naver.com+82-31-560-2061

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026