Skip to content

A comparison of safety and efficacy of i-gel and Baska mask in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

A comparison of safety and efficacy of i-gel and Baska mask in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0003428
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-01-16
Start date
2018-10-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, patients were randomly assigned one of the i-gel and Baska masks and compared

Sponsors

Dong-A University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients over 20 years of age who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy under American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification I and II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children or patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification ? or more

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Insertion time;Leak pressure;Peak pressure;expiratory tidal volume;inspiratory tidal volum;vital sign

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
complications during induction;complications during maintenence;complications during emergence

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public Contactkyoung sub yoon

Dong-A University Hospital

sub5199@naver.com+82-51-240-5390

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026