FindTrial
Sign In

COMPARISON OF ENDOSCOPIC BALLOON DILATION VERSUS PER-ORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY

COMPARISON OF OUTCOME AND COMPLICATIONS OF ENDOSCOPIC BALLOON DILATION VERSUS PER-ORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY (POEM) ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURE FOR TREATMENT OF ACHALASIA

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0003171
Enrollment
131
Registered
2018-09-07
Start date
2018-09-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

CHA Gumi Medical Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who were diagnosed with esophageal achalasia in the high-resolution manometry at the university hospital from 2000 to the date of approval of IRB were treated with pneumatic balloon dilatation or peroral endoscopic myotomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: If retrospective medical history analysis is not possible or information is very poor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Eckardt symptom score—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
complications—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactWeon Jin Ko

CHA Gumi Medical Center

wisred@naver.com+82-54-450-9562

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026