Skip to content

Comparison of the effects of intra-articular injection and periarticular injection in sacroiliac joint dysfunction patients with inguinal pain

Comparison of the effects of intra-articular injection and periarticular injection in sacroiliac joint dysfunction patients with inguinal pain

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0003008
Enrollment
48
Registered
2018-07-21
Start date
2017-11-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : In case of Group 1, the c-arm was used to identify the joint at the lower part of the sacroiliac joint. Local anesthesia was then performed with 1&#37
lidocaine followed by injection of a 3.5-inch long, 22-gauge curved tip spinal needle. After injection, globular pattern was checked around the joint and 2 mL of 0.4&#37
lidocaine was injected. If inguinal pain does not decrease one week after the procedure, intra-articular injection is performed like Group I for treatment. In case of Group 2, the c-arm was also used
lidocaine followed by a 3.5-inch long, 22-gauge curved tip. Inject 0.5 mL of contrast medium to confirm intra-articular injection and inject 2 mL of 0.4&#37
lidocaine. If the lower part of the joint is difficult, intra-articular injection is performed using the upper part of the joint.

Sponsors

The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Adult men and women over 20 years old 2. Patients with sacroiliac dysfunction with inguinal pain (If three or more of the following tests are positive : Gapping test, Thigh thrust test, Gaenslen test, Compression test, Sacral thrust test, Patrick test) who agreed to the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Pregnant 2.Symptom caused by another focus 3..Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae 4.History of lumbar operation including S1 fixation 5.Local infection 6.Coagulopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain score( Numeric Rating Scale);Procedure time

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Angiogram rate;Complication rate;Oswestry disability index

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactYOUNG KIM

The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital

anekyh@hotmail.com+82-2-2258-1330

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026