Comparison between low-tidal volume vs. spontaneous ventilations during bleb resection

Anesthesia for single-port, minimally invasive thoracoscopic bleb resection: low-tidal volume positive pressure ventilation vs. spontaneous ventilation. Prospective, single center, single-blinded, randomized comparative study

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0002979

Enrollment

Registered

2018-07-04

Start date

2018-07-31

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : For thoracoscopic bleb resection, one group will be served for conventional general anesthesia using neuromuscular blocker (rocuronium) for mechanical ventilation and endotracheal

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 15 ~ 65 years aged, complicated spontaneous pneumothorax patients who scheduled for the bleb resection. One or more blebs are detected through chest CT or x-ray, ipsilateral recurred pneumothorax. (Complicated pneumothorax includes the conditions; sustained air leakage over 5 days, hemothorx, failed re-expansion, tension pneumothorx.)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Uncomplicated, first-attack pneumothorax, non-visible blebs throug chest CT or X-ray, suspicious pleural adhesion, open thoracotomy, diseases which could be worsened with hypercapnea; glaucoma, cardiovascular and cerebral diseases.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
surgical field grading	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
operation time;Anesthesia time;Intraoperative hemodynamic variables;Patient's satisfaction	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactDong Kyu Lee

Koera University Guro Hospital

entopic@naver.com+82-2-2626-1437

Outcome results