Skip to content

The safety and efficacy of sural nerve splitting technique

The safety and efficacy of the interfascicular nerve splitting to preserve in sural nerve in patients who undergo reverse sural arterial flap.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0002760
Enrollment
80
Registered
2018-03-29
Start date
2017-06-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : For the patients included in the group of sural nerve-splitting, the lateral sural cutaneous nerve is splitted from the medial sural cutaneous nerve from where they combined to for

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The patients over 18 years old who get the operation with reverse sural artery perforator flap on their soft tissue defect of lower extremity because of chronic wound, traumaic wound or tumor resection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The patient with poor general condition and vascularity of lower extremity The patient not considered as an indication of reverse sural artery perforator flap butmore appropriate indication of other specific operation The patient disagree with the purpose of the study Impossible postoperative observation The patient who reject involvement in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Nerve conduction study;Flap total/partial necrosis ratio

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
2-point discrimination test;Dimension of numbness;Time consumed to split sural nerve;Flap salvage operation

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactHyeonwoo Kim

Seoul National University Hospital

mazlop@hanmail.net+82-2-2072-2375

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026