Skip to content

A comparative study of postoperative pain; single-hole appendectomy plus fine laparoscopic device assistant versus pure single-hole appendectomy

Comparison of postoperative PAin after Needle grasper Assisted Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy versus single incision laparoscopic appendectomy: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial (PANASILA trial)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0002746
Enrollment
110
Registered
2018-03-22
Start date
2017-12-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : When appendectomy is performed for acute appendicitis, the single incision laparoscopic appendectomy is performed in one group, and the needle grasper assisted single incision lapa

Sponsors

Chung-Ang Univerisity Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with acute appendicitis diagnosed clinically (history, physical examination or CT or ultrasound)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A case of perforated appendicitis (CT with a perforated abscess) If the laparoscopic surgery is difficult because of a history of lower abdominal surgery pregnant woman

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
NPIS(numeric pain intensity score) Immediately after the operation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Operation time (evaluation of difficulty of operation);daily highes NPIS(numeric pain intensity score);Evaluation of cosmetic satisfaction for scars

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactJong Won Kim

Chung-Ang Univerisity Hospital

drholy74@caumc.or.kr+82-2-6299-1571

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026