Skip to content

Comparisons of chest compression qualities between two-finger chest compression technique and flexed two-finger chest compression technique during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for a cardiac arrest infant

Comparisons of chest compression qualities between two-finger chest compression technique and flexed two-finger chest compression technique during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for a cardiac arrest infant

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0002730
Enrollment
42
Registered
2018-03-12
Start date
2018-03-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Others : The study participants conduct two chest compression techniques in a random order according to the cross-over design to theinfant manikin. First technique is conventional two-finger chest c

Sponsors

Chung-Ang Univerisity Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The study participants will be selected from the medical doctors who are working as active members in the cardiopulmonary resuscitation team of the Chung-Ang University hospital and agree to participate the study voluntarily after hearing the detailed explanations on the objective, design and protocols of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The participants who can not perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation because of the injuries of their fingers or hands within two-weeks are excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Average chest compression depth

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Average chest compression rate;Average hand-off time;Power of chest compression techniques

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactJe Hyeok Oh

Chung-Ang Univerisity Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026