The comparison of jaw-thrust maneuver versus McIvor blade for tracheal intubation with fiberoptic bronchoscope

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0002392

Enrollment

Registered

2017-07-28

Start date

2017-08-10

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : During fiberoptic intubation, Jaw-thrust maneuver will be applied in group J and McIvor blade will be applied in group M.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Over 19 years Patients who will undergo elective surgery under general anesthesia American society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical classification I or II Patients who agree to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: American society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical classification = III History of cervical spine surgery or herniated intervertebral disc Possibility of difficult mask ventilation Need of awake intubation Risk of regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration Craniofacial anomaly History of severe burn in cervical area Patients who reject to participate or cannot agree to the informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Time from mask off to detecting EtCO2 at the monitor	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Time from mask off to detecting vocal cord via bronchoscope monitor;Time from mask off to detecting carina via bronchoscope monitor;numbers of maneuver trial;Airway clearnce at the soft palate level;Airway clearnce at the epiglottis level;Numbers of entotracheal tube advance trial;Tissue injury related to intubation;severity of postoperative sore throat	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSeong Joo Park

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

struka@snubh.org+82-31-787-7499

Outcome results