Skip to content

costoclavicular block

The comparison of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis between interscalene and costoclavicular block for shoulder surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0002376
Enrollment
70
Registered
2017-07-14
Start date
2017-08-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Sponsors

The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American society of anesthesiology (ASA) physical status 1, 2, 3 Age: 19-80 yrs Patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Clinically significant coagulopathy Infection at the injection site Allergy to local anesthetics Severe cardiopulmonary disease(American society of anesthesiology (ASA) physical status =4) Body mass index > 35 Diabetic or other neuropathies Patients receiving opioids for chronic analgesic therapy Patients who have refused intravenous patient controlled analgesia (PCA) Inability to comprehend visual analogue scale (VAS) score and patient controlled analgesia (PCA) device Patient who does not want to receive costoclavicular or interscalene block Patients who want to receive a costoclavicular or interscalene block

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Diaphragmatic paralysis;Assessment of pulmonary function

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Amount of opioid consumption;postoperative pain

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSeunguk Bang

The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital

seungukb@naver.com+82-42-220-9046

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026