Skip to content

A randomised comparison of self-pressurised air-Q intubating laryngeal airway with LMA

A randomised comparison of self-pressurised air-Q intubating laryngeal airway with LMA supreme in children

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0002342
Enrollment
84
Registered
2017-06-01
Start date
2016-05-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : We compared the performance of LMA supreme with air-Q regarding airway leakage (seal pressures) and ease & time of insertion for better function, complications.

Sponsors

Chungnam National University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ? Pediatric patients who planned general anesthesia ? American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification 1,2 ? 1~7 years old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ? With active pulmonary symptoms (cough, fever, rhinorrhea) ? Developmental disorder ? Difficult airway ? History of laryngopharyngeal disorders ? Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease ? Hiatus hernia ? History of postoperative vomiting (within 24hrs) ? With risk factors of aspiraion, Full stomach ? Patients who refuse this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
airway leakage (sealing? ??)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
vital sign;Device score;insertion time;oropharyngeal leak pressure;complication

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public Contactja gyung hwang

Chungnam National University Hospital

cometmin06@cnuh.co.kr+82-42-280-7840

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026