Comparisons of mask for healthcare provider in Emergency room

Comparisons of fit factors between three types of N95 for healthcare providers in emergency medical center: A randomized clinical trials

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0002251

Enrollment

Registered

2017-03-07

Start date

2016-08-20

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : Three kinds of masks such as 3M 9332(valve type), 3M 1860(cup type), 3M 1870(fold type) are assigned on random numbers(www.random.org). Each participants do 7 movements wearing each k

(ii) Deep breathing

(iii) turning head side to side

(iv) Moving head up and down

(v) Talking

(vi) Smiling or grimace

(vii) Bending over. We take fit factors about each movements on mask.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subjects were recruited from Emergency Center. Doctors and nurses engaged in Emergency center were enrolled. They were healthy 18 to 60 years old.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The subjects were excluded who had infectious disease, repsiratory disease, dermatologic disease or structural problem such as facial deformation.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Fit factor	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Satisfaction of N95 respirator	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactHongjung Kim

Hanyang University Seoul Hospital

mobiledoctorkim@gmail.com+82-2-2290-8788

Outcome results