Comparison of intubation in patients with manual in-line stabilization

Comparison of the Mcgrath videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope for Double lumen tube intubation in patients with manual in-line stabilization

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0002150

Enrollment

Registered

2016-11-21

Start date

2016-06-29

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : After neuromuscular blockade, manual in-line stabilization of the cervical spine was applied by an experienced study investigator in a standaridised manner by grasping the patient’

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 19 to 60 years who are to undergo general anesthesia with one lung ventilation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: required rapid sequence induction; had a history of difficult intubation; had cervical spine instability or cervical myelopathy; had a bleeding tendency

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
the time required for intubation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
glottis view (Cormack and Lehane grade), success rate at first intubation attempt, the percentage of glottis opening, the use of external laryngeal manipulation, intubation difficulty scale	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSung Yong Park

Ajou University Hospital

anepark@hanmail.net+82-31-219-5573

Outcome results