None listed
Conditions
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: All participants enrolled in this study were volunteers who attended lectures about lung ultrasound. They were all emergency medical technician students and were novices with no previous knowledge or interest in ultrasound.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Emergency medical technician students who had the knowledge of ultrasound or experiences of ultrasound work-shop.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To evaluate non-inferiority between each group (RG vs. SG), two answer possible selections (real video clips in post-test [PT-R] vs simulated video clips in post-test [PT-S]) in the answer sheets completed by each participant were sorted according to the kind of video clips viewed. Twenty points was the highest score for PT-R and PT-S. Two months later, a retention-test was administered with the same contents as the post-test to evaluate non-inferiority between RG and SG. The scores for the retention test were also divided into two answer possible selections in the answer sheets of each participant according to the kind of video clips viewed (retention real video clips [RT-R] and retention simulated video clips [RT-S]). | — |
Countries
Korea, Republic of
Contacts
Ajou University Hospital