Comparison of three fluid warming devices for maintaining body core temperature during general anesthesia: Ranger™ vs Mega Acer Kit® vs ThermoSens®

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0001957

Enrollment

Registered

2016-07-01

Start date

2016-06-09

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : All 99 patients, who agree to participate in this study, will be randomly assigned one of three groups by using random numbers table: (1) Mega Acer Kit (Group M), (2) Ranger (Group R)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who are scheduled to undergo elective surgery under over 3 hour of general anesthesia with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification I or II.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A. Preoperative body temperature abnormality (below 36 celius degree or ablove 38 celcius degree) B. Patients with thyroid disease, diabetes, hypertension, brain tumor C. Patients who has caogulation dysfunction and bleeding tendency D. Emergency surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Esophageal temperature	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Tympanic membrane temperature;Fluid temperature before warming;Fluid temperature after warming;Temerature of operation room	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSANG HUN KIM

Chosun University Hospital

drshkim4187@yahoo.co.kr+82-62-30-3578

Outcome results