A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing between endoscopic balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for the removal of common bile duct stones

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0001852

Enrollment

100

Registered

2016-03-18

Start date

2016-03-15

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : We will divide the patients of choledocholithiasis into 2 groups(one, EBD group and the other, EST group) according to the table of random sampling numbers

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patient who has 1~1.2cm CBD stone

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: hepatoma CBD malignancy bleeding tendency(PT INR>2.0) duodenal diverticulum previous cholecystectomy or interventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography lactating or pregnant woman

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
whole extraction of CBD stone after procedure	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
age, sex;nature of CBD stone;diameter of CBD;the number of CBD stones;the diameter of the biggest CBD stone;procedural side-effect ;balloon diameter of endoscopic ballon dilation	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactWoong Ki Lee

Presbyterian Medical Center

Outcome results