Ultrasound-guided central Venous catheterization: Comparison between Oblique axis versus short axis Techniques (A prospective, randomized controlled trial)

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0001818

Enrollment

Registered

2016-02-15

Start date

2016-02-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : Two ultrasound techniques for central catheterization will be performed. The central catheterization in the control group is performed using short axis and out of plane. A short ax

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. The patients who are performed central vein catheterization 2. The patients who are performed general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Clinically significant coagulopathy 2. Infection at the injection site 3. Allergy to local anesthetics 4. Patients with risk factors for difficult venous cannulation (body mass index > 35, edema of procedure site, radiation treatment, Distorted local anatomy 5. Vascular disease 6. Diabetic or other neuropathies 7. severe cardiopulmonry disease (American Society of anesthesiology classification =4)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The incidence of posterior vessel wall puncture of internal jugular vein during central vein catheterizaion;The incudence of arterial puncture during central vein catheterizaion	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
number of attempts during Central Venous catheterization;anteroposterior and transverse diameter of the internal jugular vein;amount of overlapping of the internal jugular vein over the caritid artery;cannulation time	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSeunguk Bang

The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital

seungukb@naver.com

Outcome results