Skip to content

Comparison of N95 mask performance during intubation using 3 types airway management devices.

Comparison of Glidescope, Macintosh laryngoscopes and i-gel for N95 mask performance during intubation: a randomized simulation study of intubation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0001803
Enrollment
26
Registered
2016-02-04
Start date
2016-09-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : Participants performed intubation using 3 kinds of airway devices and they are randomly allocated to three gruop (www.random.org)Wearing 3 types of mask,each participant performed int

Sponsors

Hanyang University Seoul Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: We recruit emergency medicine physicians. We included healthy volunteers who were between 16 and 60 years old and have more than 50 experiences of intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: We excluded people who had wrist and low back disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Fit factor

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
success rate of intubation

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSanghyun Lee

Hanyang University Seoul Hospital

gagul81@gmail.com+82-2-2290-8999

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026