Comparisions of 4 video-laryngoscopes for intubation performance in difficult airway

Comparisons of the Pentax-AWS®, Glidescope®, Kingvision® with 2types blades for intubation performance in difficult airway: a randomized simulation study of airway management

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0001801

Enrollment

Registered

2016-02-03

Start date

2016-09-05

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Others : Participants were randomly allocated to four groups (www.random.org) according to first use videolyarngosope. Ten minutes prior to starting the trials, participants were allowed to practice i

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: We recruited paramedics who participated airway management workshop. We included healthy volunteers who were between 16 and 60 years old.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: We excluded people who had wrist and low back disease

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
time to intubation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Th e success rate of intubation	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSanghyun Lee

Hanyang University Seoul Hospital

gagul81@gmail.com+82-2-2290-8999

Outcome results