Skip to content

The Effect of Different Inverted Angles of Foot Orthosis on Plantar Pressure in Flexible Flat Foot

The Effect of Different Inverted Angles of Foot Orthosis on Plantar Pressure in Flexible Flat Foot

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0001596
Enrollment
20
Registered
2015-08-20
Start date
2015-08-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : Participants underwent a standardized prone casting protocol to obtain neutral impression casts. The customized rigid foot orthosis were designed in an “inverted” style and manufactur

Sponsors

Chungnam National University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All participants were evaluated during >3 consecutive radiological studies and via resting calcaneal stanindg position(RCSP) measurements. The following radiological param¬eters were screened to evaluate the alignment of both feet: anteroposterior talocalcaneal angle (APTCA), lateral talocalcaneal angle (LTTCA), lateral talometatarsal angle (LTTMA), and calcaneal pitch (CP). Flatfoot was defined as an angle of =4° at the valgus in either foot during RCSP and one of the following abnormal radiological findings: APTCA >30°, LTTCA >45°, LTTMA >4°, or CP <20°. Severe flatfoot was defined as an angle of =6° at the valgus during RCSP. We recruited only children aged 6–13 years of age with severe flatfoot.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (i) a fixed foot deformity, (ii) reported previous intervention (e.g., orthoses or surgery), (iii) congenital and developmental foot disease, and (iv) neuromuscular or central nervous system disease. Patients with a history of overuse or traumatic injury to the lower limb in the past 6 months, bony surgery to the lower limb, or systemic endocrine, neurogenic, or musculoskeletal disorders were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
peak pressure (kPa) of foot

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
maximum force (N) and contact area (cm2) of foot

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactHyunkeun Lee

Chungnam National University Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026