A comparison of the anesthetic quality of epidural vs spinal anesthesia for emegency cesarean section.

A comparison of the anesthetic quality and side effects of epidural vs spinal anesthesia for emergency cesarean sections after labor epidural analgesia.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0001391

Enrollment

220

Registered

2015-02-26

Start date

2014-07-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : Extension of epidural analgesia for labor

A 20 ml mixed solution of Lidocaine (2% lidocaine 16 ml mixed with fentanyl 100 µg, 1 : 200,000 epinephrine 50 µg, sodium bicarbonate 2 mEq: total dose 20 ml) is administered slowly via the epidural c

After removing epidural catheter used for labor epidural analgesia, heavy bupivacaine 10mg with fentanyl 15 µg is injected in subarachnoid space.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)By consent to participate in the study, those who signed the agreement in writing 2)ASA(American society of Anesthesiology) scoring 1-2 patients scheduled for intrapartum cesarean section 3)Parturient who epidurla analgesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)The parturients more than ASA(American society of Anesthesiology) 3 2)Contraindication to regional anesthesia 3)Scheduled general anesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
conversion of regional anesthesia to general anesthesia	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
the additional opioids, sedatives	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactHea-Jo Yoon

Cheil General Hospital & Women's healthcare center

Outcome results