Skip to content

Comparison of the effectiveness of the nasal intubation by the GlideScope with Magill forceps and Vascular forceps

Comparison of the effectiveness of the nasal intubation by the GlideScope with Magill forceps and Vascular forceps in normal airway patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0001310
Enrollment
60
Registered
2014-12-11
Start date
2014-11-25
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : Nasal intubation using the Magill forceps and vascular forceps with tube exchanger

Sponsors

Hanyang University Guri Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 60 patients, 18-65 years, american society of anesthesiologist physical status I, II who were arranged for elective surgeries

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria included: history of difficult intubation, larynx surgery, larynx radiotherapy, patients expected to have esophago-tracheal reflux; patients with a loose tooth; patients with a Mallampati classification of III or IV; current tracheal-, respiratory- or cardiovascular disease; patients with frequent episode of epistaxis, bleeding tendency, a body mass index (BMI) >= 35 kg/m2.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
total intubation time

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Epistaxis, sore throat

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSang Yun Cho

Hanyang University Guri Hospital

chosy@hanyang.ac.kr+82-31-560-2390

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026