Skip to content

Comparison of the performance between forward view and oblique view EUS

Comparison of the performance between forward view and oblique view EUS

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0001000
Enrollment
51
Registered
2014-02-06
Start date
2012-12-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : Patients were placed in a left lateral decubitus position and all EUS procedures were performed under conscious sedation with intravenous midazolam and propofol according to the judgm
Olympus Medical System, Tokyo, Japan) and the newly developed FV-EUS (GIF-Y-0007-UCT
Olympus Medical System, Tokyo, Japan) were used. The sequence in which these techniques were employed was randomly assigned. For the study protocol, two groups were formed depending on the experience

Sponsors

Asan Medical Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: pancreaticobiliary diseases of unknown etiology (20-89 year-old) were prospectively enrolled in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The exclusion criteria were as follows: pregnancy, bleeding tendency (prothrombin time INR > 1.5 or platelet < 80,000/µL), and critically ill patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of visualization of forward view EUS compared with Oblique view EUS

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Visualization time ;quality of EUS-FNA

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSeohyun Lee

Asan Medical Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026