Comparison of Glidescope and McGrath in simulated difficult airway

Comparison of Glidescope and MvGrath using vascular forcep and tube exchanger in simulated difficult airway

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0000989

Enrollment

Registered

2014-01-22

Start date

2014-01-13

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : compare the effectiveness of the Glidescope and McGrath indiect videolaryngoscope in simulated difficult patient

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: We considered 60 patients, ASA physical status grade I or II, aged 18-70 years who were scheduled to undergo elective surgery, for inclusion in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with a body mass index (BMI) greater than 35 kgm-2, those who were to undergo emergency operations and those expected to have difficult intubations were excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
total intubation time	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
the success rate of intubation	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSang Yun Cho

Hanyang University Guri Hospital

chosy@hanyang.ac.kr+82-31-560-2390

Outcome results