Skip to content

A Comparison of procedural sedation drugs during endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric tumor

A Comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for procedural sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric tumor

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0000938
Enrollment
80
Registered
2013-11-25
Start date
2013-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Drug : Normal saline 0.1 ml/kg/hr before 10 min to start the procedure and midazolam 0.05 mg/kg (maximum initial dose 5mg) just before the procedure started were administered intravenously to cases in

Sponsors

Konkuk University Medical Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Among the patient undergoing ESD of stomach under monitored anesthesia care (MAC), a total of 80 individuals who signed the agreement were recruited for the study. Recruited patients were equally divided into two groups, each of 40 patients, by using the assigned patient identification number (PIN).The randomized number table was generated using Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). The table was preordered by a researcher who was not involved in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to either one of the two groups (Group I; midazolam group, Group II; dexmedetomidine group), so that both the participants and the staff participating were blinded to the study drug administered except anesthesiologist. To ease keeping the double-blind test, drug administration during the procedure was performed by the anesthesiologist.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The exclusion criteria were as follows: age less than 20 years or more than 80 years; ASA physical status III-IV; pregnancy; history of alcoholism or drug abuse; allergy to any of the drugs like MDZ, DEX, and opioids; patients who refused to sign the consent; serious psychiatric problems.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
comparison of the appropriacy of sedation between the two drugs

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
recovery rapidity ;the procedure time, procedure related-complication rate, the complete resection rate of tumor, satisfaction research of the patients and doctors;the safety and side effect of the drugs

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSang Pyo Lee

Konkuk University Medical Center

ultra_pyo@hanmail.net

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026