Skip to content

Comparison of Guided Continuous Interscalene Block and Guided Continuous Cervical Epidural Analgesia in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Comparison of Efficacy between Ultrasound-guided Continuous Interscalene Block and Fluoroscope-guided Continuous Cervical Epidural Analgesia in Rotator Cuff Repair

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0000883
Enrollment
75
Registered
2013-10-15
Start date
2012-01-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : 75 patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery were randomly divided into 3 groups and each groups received fluoroscopy-guided cervical epidural or ultrasound-guid
Group FTCCEB (Initial test dose 0.2% ropivacaine 8ml, basal infusion 0.2% ropivacaine 5ml/hr, bolus = 0.2% ropivacaine 3ml, n = 25), Group UGCIB20 (Initial test dose 0.2% ropivacaine 8ml, basal infu

Sponsors

Chung-Ang Univerisity Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria were patients in age from 20 to 70 years old and of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I, II or IIIscheduled for elective arthroscopic RTC repair under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria were patient refusal, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status = 4, psychotic disorder, infection at the puncture site, coagulopathy, pregnancy, known allergy for local anesthetics, neuromuscular disorder, diaphragmatic disorder, cardiopulmonary disorder, and taking analgesics within 24 h before surgery and previous history of neck surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluation of sensory blockade;Evaluation of motor blockade;Evaluation of analgesia;Evaluation of respiratory function;Evaluation of Patient’s Subjective discomfort on the block procedure ;Evaluation of Patient’s Subjective satisfaction of the overall postoperatieve Analgesia Method

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluation of Complications

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactHwa Yong Shin

Chung-Ang Univerisity Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026