FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of the accuracy of the two landmark in internal jubular venous catheterization; an alternative landmark using combined jugular venodilation and palpation vs. the central landmark

An alternative landmark using combined jugular venodilation and palpation is more accurate than the central landmark in internal jugular venous catheterization

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0000812
Enrollment
30
Registered
2013-08-05
Start date
2013-01-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Asan Medical Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) patients who are indicated to internal jugular venous catheterization during general abdominal or neurological surgery 2) adults aged 21 or more 3) Patients of class 1 or 2 in American Society of Anesthesiology classification 4) Patients without head and neck disease, or without clincally important cardiopulmonary problems

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) abnormal findings on preoperative pulmonary function test 2) body mass index > 30 or < 18.5 3) patients with severe decreased cardiopulmonary function 4) patients with head and neck disease, who are difficult to internal jugular venous catheterization 5) Patients who cannot use internal jugular vein because of neck surgery or other medical conditions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
distance from sonographic location of internal jugular vein—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
depth of internal jugular vein—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactHyungseok Seo

Asan Medical Center

seohyungseok@gmail.com+82-2-3010-5683

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026