Effect of scheduled 2nd-look endoscopy on peptic ulcer bleeding

Is Scheduled 2nd-look Endoscopy Necessary for Patients with Peptic Ulcer Bleeding? : a Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0000565

Enrollment

320

Registered

2012-10-27

Start date

2010-08-24

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : The study group receive scheduled 2nd-look endoscopy 24-36 hrs after initial successful endoscopic hemostasis in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding of Forrest Ia-IIb, and control

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: A patients older than 20 years who had peptic ulcer bleeding such as Forrest Ia(spurting bleeding), IIb(oozing bleeding), IIa(non-bleeding visible vessel) or IIb(adherent clot) and received scheduled 2nd-look endoscopy 24-36 hrs after successful initial endoscopic hemostasis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with unsucessful primary endoscopic treatment for hemostasis 2. Patietns with peptic ulcer bleednig who had admitted due to other disease 3. Patients with peptic ulcer bleednig by already known stomach cancer, duodenal cancer, or metastatic cancer on stomach or dudenum 4. Patients who do not agree with enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Rebleeding rate	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Rebleeding rate within 30 days;Operation or radiological intervention (angiography or embolization);Amount of RBC transfused;Duration of hospitalization;Mortality rate	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSoo Jung Park

Yonsei University

Outcome results