A comparative study of diagnostic efficacy of high-risk bleeding between EG scan and nasogastric tube with lavage in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0000510

Enrollment

Registered

2012-08-24

Start date

2012-09-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : comparison of diagnostic efficacy of high-risk bleeding between EG scan and nasogastric tube with lavage in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients of suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients of normal state of consciousness and stable V/S

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: stricture of GI tract and nose reject of NG tube and EG scan insertion emergency endoscopy can not be performed as the general condition of the unstable state angiography and embolization is more appropriate emergency surgery is appropriate pregnancy status correct diagnosis is made at another hospital uncontrolled hypertension uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
diagnostic accuracy of high-risk bleeding between EG scan and NG tube with lavage	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
patient convenience of high-risk bleeding between EG scan and NG tube with lavage	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactJa Sung Choi

The Catholic Kwandong University

Outcome results