Comparison of the alignment after customized versus conventional total knee arthroplasty

Comparison of the alignment after CT based customized versus conventional total knee arthroplasty

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0000098

Enrollment

Registered

2011-02-24

Start date

2010-12-28

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device, Procedure/Surgery : We will use the same implant system-Vanguard total knee system(Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana), PS and mobile type-in the tow group. Patients who were diagnosed as severe

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: primary osteoarthritis both male & female involved

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: rheumatic arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, arthrofibrosis Parkinson disease, residual poliomyelitis, cerebral infarct, cerebral hemorrahage history severe deformity or bony destruction which need bone graft, block or stem. infectied knee, previous open knee surgery arthroplasty in ipsilateral hip or ankle arthrodesis in ipsilateral hip or ankle

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Mechanical axes of lower extremity, femur & tibia on simple radiography & CT	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Flexion angle of femoral component, posterior slope of tibial component	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSang Min Lee

Seoul National University Hospital

Outcome results