Difference between ultrasound guided approach and anatomical approach upward direction of a J-tip of the guidwire during subclavian central venous catheter insertion

Randomized, singlecenter, Difference between ultrasound guided approach and anatomical approach upward direction of a J-tip of the guidwire during subclavian central venous catheter insertion

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0000083

Enrollment

Registered

2011-01-24

Start date

2011-01-24

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device, Procedure/Surgery : 1. Induction : propofol 2g/kg, alfentanil 5 ?/kg, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg 2. monitoring : FiO2 60%, 1-2 vol% sevoflurane 3. tracheal intubation 4. rt. subclavian vein

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 18~75-year-old patients ASA I-III Patient will have taken subclavian cannulation under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: bleeding tendency malignant tumor in right atrium tricuspid valve endocarditis arrhythmia complication of subclavian cannulation in the past

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
suscess rate	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
complication	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactEun-joo Choi

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Outcome results