Skip to content

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Cervical Electrical Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease

A Randomized Study Investigating the Improvement of Swallowing Function with Low-Frequency Pulse Waves and Interference Waves in Cervical Electrical Stimulation Rehabilitation for Parkinson's Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-jRCTs062240041
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-07-29
Start date
2024-10-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson's Disease Parkinson's disease, neurodegenerative disease

Interventions

Using a low-frequency pulse wave stimulation device or an interference wave stimulation device
low-frequency pulse wave stimulation, interference wave stimulation

Sponsors

Maruyama Hirofumi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients diagnosed with Parkinson's disease as clinically probable or clinically established according to the Movement Disorder Society criteria and who have symptoms of dysphagia. 2. Patients at Hoehn-Yahr stage 2-4 at the time of enrollment. 3. Patients whose prescription for levodopa has not been changed for at least one month prior to enrollment. 4. Patients who are 18 years old or older and 85 years old or younger at the time of consent. 5. Patients who can provide written consent for participation in this study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with specific implanted electronic devices such as pacemakers. 2. Patients with a high possibility of hemorrhagic or thrombotic disorders. 3. Patients currently suffering from malignant tumors. 4. Pregnant women or those wishing to become pregnant. 5. Patients currently suffering from head and neck cancer, or with a history of such cancer or surgery. 6. Patients with febrile diseases, infectious diseases, or acute painful diseases. 7. Patients with edema, injury, ischemic tissue, venous engorgement, or metal implants in the skin or subcutaneous tissue of the neck. 8. Patients who have experienced allergic reactions, constipation, or other health issues after taking barium. 9. Any other individuals deemed inappropriate by the principal investigator or sub-investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1 Comparison with the control group, improvement in the proportion of subjects with a normal cough reflex in the 1% citric acid cough test (defined as five or more coughs per minute) at the end of the two-week intervention with interference wave stimulation 2 Comparison with the control group, improvement in the proportion of subjects with a normal cough reflex in the 1% citric acid cough test (defined as five or more coughs per minute) at the end of the two-week intervention with low-frequency pulse wave stimulation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1 Superiority in the proportion of subjects with a normal cough reflex in the 1% citric acid cough test at the end of the two-week intervention, comparing the GentleStim group and the Ito Postim group. 2 Tolerability (continuation rate of device use). The proportion of patients who were able to complete 12 or more days out of the 14-day intervention. 3 The proportion of patients with a Penetration-Aspiration Scale score of 1 or 2 in the swallowing fluoroscopy at the end of the two-week intervention, comparing the GentleStim group and the Ito Postim group to the control group. *The Penetration-Aspiration Scale is an 8-level scale (with 8 being the most severe), where 1 indicates no entry into the larynx or airway, and 2 indicates laryngeal entry above the vocal cords with no residue in the larynx. 4 Changes in bolus passage as assessed by swallowing fluoroscopy phase analysis at the end of the two-week intervention, comparing the GentleStim group and the Ito Postim group to the control group. 5 The proportion of patients with normal swallowing status (FOIS scale, EAT-10) at the end of the two-week intervention, comparing the GentleStim group and the Ito Postim group to the control group. *FOIS scale: 7 (full score), EAT-10: 2 points or less are considered normal. 6 Changes in multichannel electromyography findings at the end of the two-week intervention, comparing the GentleStim group and the Ito Postim group to the control group. 7 Changes in tongue pressure values at the end of the two-week intervention, comparing the GentleStim group and the Ito Postim group to the control group. 8 Changes in swallowing sounds assessed by electronic auscultation at the end of the two-week intervention, comparing the GentleStim group and the Ito Postim group to the control group. 9 Changes in salivary substance P at the end of the two-week intervention, comparing the GentleStim group and the Ito Postim group to the control group.

Contacts

Public ContactMasahiro Nakamori

Hiroshima University Hospital

mnakamori1@gmail.com+81-82-257-5201

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026