Skip to content

EMAT Study

The Effect of repetitive transcranial Magnetic stimulation on patients with Autism spectrum disorder and Traumatic symptoms: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled Phase II study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-jRCTs052220170
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-02-15
Start date
2023-02-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism spectrum disorder

Interventions

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Sponsors

Ikawa Daisuke
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Autism Spectrum Disorder(ASD): Patients diagnosed by semi-structured interview and psychiatric examination using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) 2) Patients with trauma symptoms: Not necessarily required to have experienced severe life-threatening trauma International Trauma Interview (ITI) Part 1>=6 points and Revised Event Impact Scale Japanese version (IES-R)>=25 points. *ITI Part 1 PTSD Assessment Section, Part 2 Complex PTSD(CPTSD) Assessment Section 3) Age: 18<=and<40 4) Gender: both 5) Patients with written consent of this clinical study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Full IQ < 70(WAIS-IV) 2) Patients with suicidal ideation and suicide attempts within the last year 3) Drug or alcohol abuse 4) Pregnant women 5) Serious physical illness 6) Personality disorder 7) A history of epileptic / convulsive seizures or their comorbidities 8) Taking drugs that lower the seizure threshold (tricyclic antidepressants, maprotiline, theophylline, methylphenidate, ketamine, clozapine, zotepine, etc.) 9) Organic brain dysfunction and lesions 10) Cardiac pacemaker 11) Internal metal objects near the stimulation site(cochlear implants, magnetic clips, deep brain stimulator, vagus nerve stimulator) 12) Patients who are disqualified as participants by the investigator or sub-investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change from baseline(visit1) to the next week(visit13) post-intervention in ITI total score(PTSD assessment section)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1) Change from baseline(visit1) to 1 month(visit14) and 2 month(visit15) post-intervention in ITI total score(PTSD assessment section) 2) Change from baseline(visit1) to each assessment time(visit13,14,15) in ITI subscale(PTSD assessment section) 3) Change from baseline(visit1) to each assessment time(visit13, 14, 15) in ITI total score and subscale(CPTSD assessment section) 4) Change from baseline(visit1) to each assessment time(visit13, 14, 15) in IES-R total score and subscale 5) Change from baseline(visit2) to each assessment time(visit13, 14, 15) in BDI-II score 6) Change from baseline(visit2) to each assessment time(visit13, 14, 15) in WHOQOL26 score 7) Responder rate: responder defined as the percentage of participants who met the criteria from baseline (visit1) to each assessment time (visits13, 14, 15) with a total score improvement of at least 30% in ITI (Parts 1 and 2) or IES-R

Contacts

Public ContactDaisuke Ikawa

Nara Medical University Hospital

navi@naramed-u.ac.jp+81-744223051

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026