Skip to content

Neurofeedback for phantom limb pain

Specified Clinical Trial for neurofeedback treatment for phantom limb pain - DecMNef-PLP study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-jRCTs052220058
Enrollment
10
Registered
2022-06-28
Start date
2022-06-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Phantom limb pain

Interventions

Two types of training are used as interventions: real training and sham training. 1) Real training. DecNef training is performed using a decoder created using magnetoencephalographic signals from whe

Sponsors

Yanagisawa Takufumi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Age between 18 and 85 years old at the time of obtaining consent, regardless of gender and severity of illness (2) Patients who have given written consent to participate in this study (3) Patients with upper limb amputation or complete brachial plexus avulsion, who have no sensation in a single upper limb, phantom limb sensation and phantom pain. (4) Patients who have phantom pain that interferes with their daily life for more than 3 months, although the intensity of phantom pain is not determined by VAS.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Patients with a severe neurological dysfunction that makes it impossible to perform the task. (2) Patients with serious underlying diseases other than the target disease (3) Other patients for whom participation in this study is deemed inappropriate by the principal investigator or sub-investigator. (4) Patients with implanted devices such as pacemakers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in average VAS in the 7 days after the end of the 2-month training from the average VAS in the 7 days before the training (%), comparison between real training and sham training

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
(1) Change in average SF-MPQ2 total value in the 7 days following the end of the 2-month training period from the average SF-MPQ2 total value in the 7 days prior to training (%) , comparison between real training and sham training (2) Number of days in which the VAS value after each training session is lower than 70% of the average 7-day VAS value before training , comparison between real training and sham training (3) Number of adverse events other than pain change , comparison between real training and sham training (4) The classification accuracy of magnetoencephalography during the phantom hand movements, and the changes of the classification accuracy before and after training

Contacts

Public ContactTakufumi Yanagisawa

The University of Osaka Hospital

tyanagisawa@nsurg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp+81-6-6879-3652

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026