Skip to content

Evaluation of treatment response for immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients using [18F]F-AraG PET/CT

Evaluation of treatment response for immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients using [18F]F-AraG PET/CT

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-jRCTs051220109
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-10-26
Start date
2022-10-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-small cell lung cancer lung cancer

Interventions

1) Perform 1st [18F]F-AraG PET/CT scanning within 2 weeks before the initial administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors 2) Perform 2nd [18F]F-AraG PET/CT scanning between 2 weeks and 6 weeks after

Sponsors

Nakamoto Yuji
Lead Sponsor
Nobashi W Tomomi
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Confirmed non-small cell lung cancer by pathology. 2) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1 or 2. 3) Patients without history of immune checkpoint inhibitors approved in Japan, but clinically applicable and planned to be prescribed. 4) Patients who performed FDG-PET/CT

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Pregnant, possibly pregnant, or breastfeeding women. 2) Very poor physical condition. 3) Outstandingly difficult in communication.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Estimation of effective period of immune checkpoint inhibitors using [18F]F-AraG PET/CT by calculating delta SUVmax of primary site before and after starting immune checkpont inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
# Correlation of SUVmax, SUVmean, and the value of SUVmean multiplied by volume of interest in the 1st [18F]F-AraG PET/CT scanning, and the expression rate of CD8, PD-1, and Treg cells in pathological specimens from the primary site and available lymph nodes. # Comparison of pretreatment [18F]FDG PET/CT vs [18F]F-AraG PET/CT in terms of correlation of SUVmax, SUVmean, and the value of SUVmean multiplied by volume of interest and the expression rate of CD8, PD-1, and Treg cells in pathological specimens from the primary site and available lymph nodes.

Contacts

Public ContactTomomi Nobashi

Kyoto University Hospital

nobaco@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp+81-75-751-3760

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026