Skip to content

PERSIST-PWI Trial

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone vs. Pulmonary Vein Isolation plus Posterior Wall Isolation Using Pulsed Field Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-jRCTs032250541
Enrollment
500
Registered
2025-12-01
Start date
2026-02-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Persistent Atrial Fibrillation,Posterior Wall Isolation,Pulsed Field Ablation

Interventions

Subjects were randomized to receive either pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone or PVI combined with posterior wall isolation (PWI).
D016606

Sponsors

Okumura Yasuo
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients aged 18 years or older at the time of obtaining informed consent. 2.Patients diagnosed with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF),defined as AF lasting for 7 days or more or requiring cardioversion,based on a 12-lead electrocardiogram or Holter monitoring. 3.Patients with symptomatic persistent AF who are refractory to, intolerant of, or contraindicated for Class I or Class III antiarrhythmic drugs. 4.Patients with a duration of AF of 3 years or less. 5Patients who have the willingness and ability to participate in all follow-up assessments and examinations conducted at an approved study site. 6.Patients who have provided written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Atrial,valvular, and myocardial conditions a. Patients with a history of left atrial ablation (including PVI). b. Patients with a left atrial diameter (LAD) > 55 mm on echocardiography performed within 4 weeks prior to consent. c. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 160 mmHg or DBP > 95 mmHg confirmed at baseline on two occasions). c. Patients with bleeding disorders or inability to achieve adequate anticoagulation. d. Patients with active hematologic disease (e.g.,bleeding diathesis,thrombocytopenia, leukemia,malignant lymphoma,myelodysplastic syndrome). e. Patients with embolic protection filters in the vena cava or femoral thrombus requiring femoral access. f. Patients with a history of organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, or currently undergoing transplant evaluation. g. Patients with active or progressive malignancy (remission cases are eligible). h. Patients with obesity (BMI > 40.0). i. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes or HgbA1c > 8.0% within 90 days prior to consent. j. Patients with untreated severe obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index > 30). k. Patients with contraindications to anticoagula

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
compare the efficacy and safety between pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone and PVI combined with posterior wall isolation (PWI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who underwent pulsed field ablation (PFA) using the FARAPULSE system.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Incidence of individual events (e.g., success (ablation) procedure in acute phase,reablation,electrical cardioversion,dose escalation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy,etc.) 2.Time to atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence (time-to-event analysis) 3.AF burden (percentage of time in atrial fibrillation) 4.Changes in quality of life scores (assessed by AFEQT and EQ-5D-5L)

Contacts

Public ContactYasuhiko Yoshida

Nouvelle Place Inc.

ya-yoshida@m3.com+81-3-6680-2525

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026