Skip to content

The study comparing the conventional test and using the immersive VR method

The Assessment of the unilateral spatial neglect using the immersive VR method in peripersonal space and extrapersonal space

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-jRCTs032200451
Enrollment
40
Registered
2021-03-31
Start date
2022-04-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

stroke (cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage) left unilateral spatial neglect

Interventions

After performing MMSE, confirmation of dominant hand, Barthel Index, and Behavioural inattention test, the subjects performe the line bisection test using the immersive VR method in a VR space (width
the conventional test, the assessment using the immersive VR method

Sponsors

Wada Naoki
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patient group 1) with ages ranging from 40 to 79. 2) male and female. 3) presence of a first-time right hemisphere stroke (cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage). 4) even if the patients have aphasia, they can understand the instructions and perform the tests. 5) more than 2 weeks after onset and be in a stable condition. 6) can sit independently on chair or in wheelchair. 7) signed informed patients or family consent. healthy group 1) with ages ranging from 40 to 79. 2) male and female. 3) signed informed subjects or family consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patient group 1) a history of major neurological disorders other than stroke. 2) a history of major psychiatric disorders. 3) with head injury. 4) with disturbance of consciousness. 5) with cognitive disorders (the score of Mini-Mental State Examination under 23). 6) presence of visual impairment (e.g. visual field deficit, damage to the optic radiation and the occipital lobe). 7) judged to be unsuitable to the assessment by doctors in the team. The study was approved by the local ethics committee at the hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. healthy group 1) a history of major neurological disorders other than stroke. 2) a history of major psychiatric disorders. 3) with head injury. 4) with disturbance of consciousness. 5) with cognitive disorders (the score of Mini-Mental State Examination under 23). 6) presence of visual impairment (e.g. visual field deficit, damage to the optic radiation and the occipital lobe). 7) judged to be unsuitable to the assessment by doctors in the team. The study was approved by the local ethics committee at the hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of the Behavioural Inattention Test and the assessment using the immersive VR method

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1) Deviation of the line bisection 2) Gaze distribution of the horizontal direction 3) Questionarie of the VR sickness

Contacts

Public ContactMasayuki Tazawa

Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine

mastaz1@gunma-u.ac.jp+81-27-220-8532

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026