Skip to content

The efficacy of abaloparatide in improving quality of life with reduction of lower back pain in new osteoporotic vertebral fractures

The efficacy of abaloparatide in improving quality of life with reduction of lower back pain in new osteoporotic vertebral fractures - ABL-OVF

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-jRCTs021250002
Enrollment
120
Registered
2025-05-20
Start date
2025-08-25
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoporosis

Interventions

After confirming that all eligibility criteria are met, random allocation to either the abaloparatide treatment group or the alendronate treatment group is performed. Eligibility verification and allo

Sponsors

Tsuchie Hiroyuki
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) The patient has been diagnosed with osteoporosis according to the diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis. 2) A new vertebral fracture of only one vertebra has been identified in T11, T12 or L1-L5. 3) The new vertebral fracture in question has been determined by the physician to be a fragility fracture that occurred within two weeks prior to the date of obtaining consent. 4) Age at the time of occurrence of the causative vertebral fracture was men aged 55 or older or postmenopausal women aged 55 or older. Inpatient/outpatient status. 5) Pain due to the causative vertebral fracture and an NRS of 4 or more for either 'during the movement of getting up from the supine position' or 'during the movement of turning over from the supine position' at the time of obtaining consent. 6) Determined by a physician to have osteoporosis with a high risk of fracture.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Patients with contraindications to abaloparatide administration. Patients with hypercalcaemia, patients considered to be at high risk of developing osteosarcoma (patients with Paget's disease of bone, patients with unexplained high levels of alkaline phosphatase, patients who have received previous radiotherapy with possible bone effects), patients with primary malignant or metastatic bone tumours, patients with metabolic bone diseases other than osteoporosis, patients with a history of hypersensitivity to the drug. Patients with metabolic bone disease other than osteoporosis, patients with a history of hypersensitivity to this drug. 2) Patients with contraindications to alendronate administration. Patients with disorders that delay the passage of the oesophagus such as oesophageal stricture or achalasia (inability to relax the oesophagus), patients who are unable to remain upright or stand for more than 30 minutes, patients with a history of hypersensitivity to bisphosphonates, hypocalcaemia. 3) Patients who have used denosumab within the past year from the date consent was obtained. 4) Patients who have used teriparatide in the past from the date of consent. 5) Patients using teriparatide, denosumab or romosozumab at the time the causative vertebral fracture occurred. 6) Patients with spinal implant insertion (including percutaneous vertebroplasty). 7) Patients with high-energy trauma. 8) Patients with impaired renal function (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) less than 30 mL/min/1.73m2 based on the Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) estimation formula). 9) Patients with dementia who are unable to assess pain. 10) Patients who were unable to walk independently before the injury. 11) Patients with two or more new vertebral fractures at enrolment. 12) Patients undergoing treatment for malignancy (including patients with a history of osteosarcoma). 13) Patients taking oral steroids. 14) Patients with diabetes using insulin (type 1 diabetes and patients with type 2 diabetes using insulin). 15) Patients participating in clinical studies involving other interventions. 16) Other patients deemed unsuitable for this study by the principal investigator or sub-investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in disease-specific quality of life assessment with the RDQ at 12 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1) Assessment of pain at the fracture site using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS during the movement of getting up from the supine position and turning over from the supine position). 2) Comprehensive quality of life assessment using the EQ-5D. 3) Vertebral collapse ratio using simple X-ray images. 4) Vertebral kyphosis angle (Wedge angle, Kyphosis angle) using simple X-ray images. 5) Cleft formation on plain radiographs. 6) Bone density by DXA (frontal lumbar vertebrae, femoral neck). 7) Bone metabolism markers (P1NP, TRACP-5b) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

Contacts

Public ContactHiroyuki Tsuchie

Akita University Hospital

tsuchie@doc.med.akita-u.ac.jp+81-18-834-1111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026