Skip to content

Comparison of iron kinetics maintenance from Darbepoetin for hemodialysis patients to Epoetin beta pegol administration switching administration and Epoetin beta pegol twice a month as an index hepcidin 25 -ERI (prospective observational study)

Comparison of iron kinetics maintenance from Darbepoetin for hemodialysis patients to Epoetin beta pegol administration switching administration and Epoetin beta pegol twice a month as an index hepcidin 25 -ERI (prospective observational study) - Comparison of iron kinetics maintenance from Darbepoetin to CERA

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-jRCT1090220252
Enrollment
20
Registered
2016-06-20
Start date
2016-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

renal anemia

Interventions

Intervention type: Name of intervention: Dose form / Japanese Medical Device Nomenclature: Route of administration / Site of application: Dose per administration: Dosing frequency / Frequency of use:

Sponsors

shogo kimura
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: A common selection criteria) Patients - three times a week hemodialysis have received more than one year Patients obvious iron deficiency is not observed in-the past three months - 20 years of age or older patients Patients who obtained the consent, with respect to the present study (A group) DA was administered once a week Hb is 7.1 - 9.9g / dL and the effect inadequate for switching to CERA Patients were example Patient - DA dose per week of 10 - 60 (B group) Patients receiving CERA - twice a monthPatients and one month CERA dose per month of 50 -200 Patients - Hb concentration of the past three months has remained at 10 - 12g / dL

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient management is insufficient -Hb concentration (Hb patients 13g / dL has been confirmed) Hypertensive patients poorly controlled with oral medicine,

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Hb,Frt,TSAT,Hep,MCV,at the start of ERI value at the end of ERI value

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Target Hb retention rate

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public Contactshogo kimura

ryogoku ekimae dialysis clinic

shogo-k@kanazawa-med.ac.jp+81-50-5865-5610

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026