Skip to content

Comparison of treatment results of endovascular treatment vs surgical treatment for patients with vascular access stenosis.

Comparison of treatment results of endovascular treatment vs surgical treatment for patients with vascular access stenosis.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-jRCT1090220088
Enrollment
200
Registered
2012-05-30
Start date
2012-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

vascular access stenosis and obstruction

Interventions

Intervention type:PROCEDURE Name of intervention:surgical treatment Dose form / Japanese Medical Device Nomenclature:OTHER surgical treatment Route of administration / Site of application:NOT APPLICAB

Sponsors

Kawashima Hospital
Lead Sponsor
Naruto Kawashima Clinic, Kawashima Kamojima Clinic and Wakimachi Kawashima Clinic
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1)Patients with symptoms of the following two or more times *Dialysis blood flow rate less than 250ml *Dynamic venous pressure more than 180mmHg (when the blood flow 250ml/min dialysis) *Static venous pressure more than 70mmHg *The presence of more than 5% recirculation *Swelling of the limb vascular access clearly recognize the difference between the left and right *Obstruction (2) Patients with written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who are not appropriate to participate to the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary patency rate

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactHironobu Arai

Kawashima Hospital

arai@khg.or.jp+81-88-631-0110

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026