Skip to content

ENSEMBLE-VISION

A Multi-center Observational Study Evaluating the Diagnostic Accuracy of Treatment Response Criteria After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Ancillary analysis of ENSEMBLE-1 and 2 study - ENSEMBLE-VISION

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-jRCT1050260026
Enrollment
48
Registered
2026-04-17
Start date
2026-04-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rectal cancer

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Watanabe Jun
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who meet all of the following criteria: 1) Patients with rectal cancer who were enrolled in the ENSEMBLE-1 Trial or ENSEMBLE-2 Trial 2) Age: 18 years or older and 75 years or younger 3) Sex: not specified (both male and female eligible)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who meet any of the following criteria: 1) Patients who discontinued or deviated from the protocol treatment in the ENSEMBLE-1 Trial or ENSEMBLE-2 Trial 2) Patients with missing endoscopic or MRI data before or after total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) 3) Patients who declined participation in this study 4) Patients deemed inappropriate for inclusion by the principal investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The proportion of pathological complete response (pCR) and sustained clinical complete response (cCR), as well as the diagnostic accuracy, according to each set of response criteria.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1 Interobserver agreement for endoscopic and MRI findings according to each set of response criteria 2) The proportion of pathological complete response (pCR) and sustained clinical complete response (cCR), as well as diagnostic accuracy, according to endoscopic findings 3) The proportion of pCR and sustained cCR, as well as diagnostic accuracy, according to MRI findings 4) The proportion of pCR and sustained cCR, as well as diagnostic accuracy, according to the level of confidence in endoscopic and MRI assessments 5) The proportion of pCR and sustained cCR, as well as diagnostic accuracy, stratified by interobserver agreement in endoscopic and MRI evaluations 6) The proportion of pCR and sustained cCR, as well as diagnostic accuracy, according to neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens 7) The proportion of pCR and sustained cCR, as well as diagnostic accuracy, according to pre-treatment endoscopic findings (macroscopic type, tumor size, location, and circumferential involvement) 8) The proportion of pCR and sustained cCR, as well as diagnostic accuracy, according to pre-treatment MRI findings (depth of invasion, extramural venous invasion, mesorectal fascia involvement, lymph node metastasis, and tumor deposits) 9) The proportion of pCR and sustained cCR, as well as diagnostic accuracy, according to circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis results

Contacts

Public ContactMasafumi Nishio

Yokohama City University Medical Center

mnishio@yokohama-cu.ac.jp+81-45-261-5656

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026