Skip to content

A study comparing different wound closure methods to prevent infection after colorectal cancer surgery

A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing subcuticular closure versus no subcuticular closure in colorectal cancer surgery for the prevention of surgical site infection - SCISSOR Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-jRCT1040260008
Enrollment
2000
Registered
2026-04-15
Start date
2026-04-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal cancer Colorectal cancer

Interventions

This study evaluates wound closure techniques using a 2x2 factorial design, comparing subcutaneous suturing (with vs without) and fascial closure methods (continuous vs interrupted) in laparoscopic or
Surgery
Subcutaneous suturing
Fascial closure

Sponsors

Matsuhashi Nobuhisa
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patients aged >=18 years with colorectal cancer who are scheduled to undergo laparoscopic or robot-assisted resection (with a mini-laparotomy via a midline or Pfannenstiel incision). - Patients in whom wound closure can be performed according to the study protocol. - Patients who have received a full explanation of the study and have provided written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer accompanied by bowel obstruction who are judged to require emergency or urgent surgery, those requiring preoperative colonic stent placement, or those considered unsuitable for standard mechanical bowel preparation. - Patients scheduled for placement of prosthetic material (e.g., immediate mesh implantation) at the same incision site. - Patients with severe active infection or immunocompromised conditions (e.g., severe neutropenia). - Pregnant women or those with a high possibility of pregnancy. - Patients in whom standardization of the study procedures is considered difficult (e.g., inability to adhere to the protocol in emergency surgery). - Patients judged to be inappropriate for inclusion in the study by the principal investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of superficial incisional surgical site infection (SSI) within 30 days postoperatively, defined according to CDC criteria, with an ASEPSIS score >20 considered as confirmed SSI.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of incisional hernia at 12 and 24 months postoperatively, assessed by abdominal CT and clinical examination.

Contacts

Public ContactKeita Matsumoto

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gifu University Hospital

10b6.yncc@gmail.com+81-58-230-6235

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026