Skip to content

Suprapapillary stent-by-stent deployment with slim-fully covered metal stents versus plastic stens for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction

Suprapapillary stent-by-stent deployment with slim-fully covered metal stents versus plastic stens for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction - SBSFLUX Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-jRCT1040250073
Enrollment
70
Registered
2025-08-05
Start date
2025-08-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malignant hilar biliary obstruction

Interventions

The current first-line treatment for unresectable malignant hilar biliary stricture at many institutions in Japan is the placement of multiple intraductal plastic stents (SBS placement). This study ai

Sponsors

Inoue Tadahisa
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients diagnosed with malignant hilar bile duct stricture by histopathology, cytology or imaging studies. 2. Bismuth classification type II or higher. 3. Unresectable cases. 4. Patients with abnormal values in serum total bilirubin, AST, ALT, GTP, or ALP requiring endoscopic biliary drainage. 5. Patients aged 18 years or older at the time of consent, regardless of gender. 6. Patients who have received sufficient explanation about the study, fully understood the content, and provided written informed consent of their own free will.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients who have already undergone metal stent placement. 2. Patients undergoing re-intervention for RBO. 3. Patients with surgically altered anatomy other than Billroth-I reconstruction. 4. Patients with a history of biliary reconstruction. 5. Patients with a history of chronic cholangitis such as primary sclerosing cholangitis or IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis. 6. Cases where the stricture extends near the duodenal papilla, making intraductal stent placement difficult. 7. Cases in which placement of two or more stents is either difficult or unnecessary due to prior hepatic resection or intrahepatic tumors. 8. Cases with severely separated intrahepatic bile ducts where drainage is unlikely to improve the condition. 9. Cases where most of the liver is occupied by tumor and improvement through bile duct drainage is not expected. 10. Patients with an expected prognosis of less than three months. 11. Patients judged to be unsuitable for safe endoscopic procedures. 12. Cases where access to the duodenal papilla is difficult. 13. Pregnant women or those who may be pregnant. 14. Patients deemed unsuitable for this study by the principal investigator or sub-investigators.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
6-month RBO-free Rate

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Time to RBO (TRBO) 2. Overall survival 3. Rate of RBO 4. Causes of RBO 5. Technical success rate 6. Clinical success rate 7. Procedure time 8. Incidence and types of adverse events other than RBO 9. Technical success rate and details of reintervention for RBO 10. Success rate of stent removal during reintervention for RBO 11. Clinical success rate of reintervention for RBO 12. Procedure time for reintervention for RBO 13. Incidence and types of adverse events during reintervention for RBO 14. TRBO after reintervention for RBO 15. Total number of reinterventions and total number of RBO occurrences

Contacts

Public ContactTadahisa Inoue

Aichi Medical University

tinoue-tag@umin.ac.jp+81-561623311

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026