Skip to content

MARBLE Trial

Minimal endoscopic sphincterotomy with papillary balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of common bile duct stones (MARBLE Trial)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-jRCT1040250008
Enrollment
280
Registered
2025-04-21
Start date
2025-04-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Common bile duct stone Common bile duct stone, Choledocholithiasis

Interventions

Currently, endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is the first-line treatment for papillary intervention in the management of small common bile duct stones. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of minima
D016717
minimal endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilation, ESBD, endoscopic sphincterotomy, EST

Sponsors

Inoue Tadahisa
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients diagnosed with common bile duct stones via imaging modalities such as CT, MRCP, abdominal ultrasound, or endoscopic ultrasound. 2. Patients for whom endoscopic stone removal is deemed necessary. 3. Patients who are 18 years of age or older at the time of consent, regardless of gender. 4. Patietns who have received a thorough explanation of the study, fully understood it, and provided written informed consent voluntarily.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with common bile duct stones measuring 12 mm or more in diameter. 2. Patients with surgically altered anatomy other than Billroth-I reconstruction. 3. Patients with biliary tract reconstruction. 4. Patients with concomitant biliary strictures. 5. Patients with biliary tumors, including duodenal papillary tumors. 6. Patients with intradiverticular papilla. 7. Patients taking antithrombotic agents where withdrawal or adjustment of medication is not feasible in accordance with the guidelines. 8. Patients with bleeding tendency (platelet count 1.5). 9. Patients with concomitant severe cholangitis. 10. Patients with concomitant pancreatitis. 11. Patients with any prior intervention at the duodenal papilla. 12. Patients in which endoscopic treatment is deemed unsafe. 13. Patients who are pregnant or possibly pregnant. 14. Patients deemed unsuitable for this study by the principal investigator or sub-investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The rate of procedure-related adverse event

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Type and severity of procedure-related adverse events 2. Technical success rate (rate at which ESBD or EST was completed as per protocol) 3. Clinical success rate (rate of complete stone removal in a single session) 4. Total procedure time (from the start of biliary cannulation to completion of stone removal) 5. Procedure time required for stone removal (from completion of ESBD or EST to completion of stone removal) 6. Rate of mechanical lithotripsy performed 7. Stone recurrence rate during the follow-up period (up to 5 years after registration), following successful stone removal 8. Time to stone recurrence during the follow-up period (up to 5 years after registration), following successful stone removal 9. Incidence of biliary events during the follow-up period (up to 5 years after registration), following successful stone removal 10. Time to biliary event occurrence during the follow-up period (up to 5 years after registration), following successful stone removal

Contacts

Public ContactTadahisa Inoue

Aichi Medical University

tinoue-tag@umin.ac.jp+81-561623311

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026