Skip to content

DREAM study

Direct comparison of trans Radial approach and trans fEmoral Approach for the endovascular treatMent of ilio-femoral arterial disease

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-jRCT1032250184
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-06-24
Start date
2025-06-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ilio-femoral arterial disease LEAD, TRA, TFA, EVT

Interventions

TRANS RADIAL APPROACH VS TRANS FEMORAL APPROACH
TRA, TFA

Sponsors

Nakamura Masato
Lead Sponsor
Nakamura Masato
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with LEAD due to symptomatic AI lesions who are scheduled for endovascular treatment are eligible Patients who meet all of the following criteria will be considered Patients 20 years of age or older Patients with intermittent claudication AI lesions (if lesions are present below the inguinal ligament, initial treatment should be limited to AI lesions only) Patients deemed by the surgeon to be eligible for both TRA/TFA Patients whose written consent is obtained from the patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who are thought to have a life expectancy of 2 years or less Female patients who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant Patients who have had or are having a hemorrhagic stroke within 3 months prior to the procedure Patients who have received thrombolytic therapy within 30 days prior to the procedure Patients who have undergone surgery (surgical procedure, endovascular treatment, etc.) within 15 days prior to the procedure or are scheduled to undergo surgery within 30 days after the procedure Patients with drug hypersensitivity syndrome or contraindication to antiplatelet agents or cilostazol (or similar agents) required in this clinical study Patients with bleeding (hemophilia, capillary fragility, intracranial bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, urinary tract bleeding, hemoptysis, vitreous bleeding, etc.) Patients with congestive heart failure. Patients allergic to contrast media Patients who are currently participating or will participate in other clinical trials Patients who are unable to walk unassisted Patients on or scheduled for hemodialysis Patients with bilateral common iliac lesions contiguous from the aorta Patients with a history of surgical revascularization or major amputation of the lower extremity, whether ipsilateral or contralateral Stent restenotic lesions Patients deemed inappropriate in the physician's judgment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time from puncture to start of ambulation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Procedure success rate: completion of procedure without crossover Walking ability 5 minutes after sheath removal Time from puncture to discharge Time from sheath removal to discharge Time from sheath removal to bed release Manual compression time in the catheterization room Hemostasis time Success rate of hemostatic devices Pseudoaneurysm/hematoma after release of pressure Length of hospital stay Cost of treatment Patient satisfaction (SF-8) Vascular complications confirmed by body surface echocardiography Major adverse cardiac events at 30 days postoperatively Major adverse cardiac, cerebral, and limb events (MACLE: major adverse cardiac, cerbebrotic, and limb events) and BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) 2, 3, 5 bleeding complications and puncture site-related complications at 30 days postoperatively Composite endpoint of site-related complications

Contacts

Public ContactMasato Nakamura

Toho University

masato@oha.toho-u.ac.jp+81-3-3468-1251

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026