Skip to content

A RCT of evaluating performance of puncture needles in EUS-TA for pancreatic tumors

A randomized controlled trial of superior understanding of puncture reliability measurement in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for pancreatic tumors using puncture needles with different tip geometries - SUPREME-TA study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-jRCT1032240067
Enrollment
42
Registered
2024-05-08
Start date
2024-10-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic tumors Pancreatic Neoplasms

Interventions

The order of puncture needles to be used will be randomly assigned in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling (EUS-TA) of pancreatic mass lesions as follows: (1) 1st: novel puncture needle (Centu

Sponsors

Hiroshi Ohyama
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who meet all of the following conditions are eligible 1) Persons who are 20 years of age or older at the time of obtaining consent 2) Patients with pancreatic mass lesions eligible for EUS-TA 3) Patients who have been fully informed of the study and given written consent of their own free will based on a thorough understanding of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who meet any of the following conditions are not eligible 1) ECOG Performance Status 3 or higher 2) Bleeding risk with HAS-BLED score of 3 or higher or platelet count less than 50,000/mm3 3) Receiving two or more antithrombotic agents 4) Presence of a pancreatic mass undetectable by EUS 5) Pregnancy 6) Refusal to participate 7) Patients deemed by the study investigator or sub-investigator to be unsuitable for the safe conduct of this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of tissue scores of 5 for both conventional and novel puncture needle specimens, following a previous report that defined a tissue score of 5 as one of high quality and sufficient for histological assessment (total tissue sample > x10 power field in length)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
-Tissue area of each specimen obtained with the conventional and novel puncture needle -Percentage of tumor cells in each of the conventional and novel puncture needles -Blood contamination rate of conventional and novel puncture needles -Puncture performance of the conventional and novel puncture needles -Treatment time for the conventional and novel puncture needles -Frequency of adverse events after testing with the conventional and novel puncture needles

Contacts

Public ContactOhyama Hiroshi

Chiba University Hospital

ohyama.hiroshi@chiba-u.jp+81-43-222-7171

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026