Comparative study between early extraction after SMAP technique and SPIED techniqu

Comparative study between early extraction after SMAP technique and SPIED technique for peritoneal dialysis induction.

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-jRCT1032230471

Enrollment

Registered

2023-11-22

Start date

2023-11-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic kidney disease stage G5 Chronic kidney disease, stage G5, peritoneal dialysis

Interventions

Introduction of peritoneal dialysis by either early extraction after SMAP technique or SPIED technique

D010531

SMAP technique, early extraction, SPIED, peritoneal dialysis

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with chronic kidney disease stage G5 scheduled for induction of peritoneal dialysis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who are judged by their physician to be unsuitable for induction of peritoneal dialysis

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Mean number of peritoneal dialysis catheter-related complications (dialysate leak, outlet site infection, subcutaneous tunnel infection, catheter malposition, catheter-related peritonitis) per year. Catheter-related complication free rate.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Patient's subjective quality of life assessment (SF-36, EQ-5D-5L, etc.), PD continuation rate, etc.	—

Contacts

Public ContactAkihito Sannomiya

Itabashi Chuo Medical Center

san@rb3.so-net.ne.jp+81-3-3967-1181

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026