Skip to content

Effect of PENG block on preoperative rehabilitation for patients with femoral neck fracture

Effect of PENG block on preoperative rehabilitation for patients with femoral neck fracture - PENG block on prehab for hip fracture

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-jRCT1031220004
Enrollment
10
Registered
2022-04-06
Start date
2022-04-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Femoral neck fracture Femoral neck fracture, hip fracture

Interventions

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block
PENG block

Sponsors

Sugiyama Daisuke
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Patients who are 20 years old or older at the time of obtaining the consent form (2) Patients with a stage 3-4 femoral neck fracture who are scheduled to undergo artificial head replacement according to the Garden classification. (3) ASA-PS (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status): 1 (good general condition without complications) to 3 (severe systemic disease but not incapacitated)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Patients with dementia (2) Patients with allergies to the target drug (3) Patients who could not stand before the injury (4) Patients with a history of artificial head replacement (5) Patients who have already participated in this study (6) Patients with infection at the site where PENG block will be performed (7) Patients who are judged by the doctor in charge to be inappropriate for participation in this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Success rate of standing during initial rehabilitation (standing and supporting weight with or without caregiving)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
(1) Healthy limb SLR (Straight Leg Raise; lower limb extension elevation) test (2) Success rate of bridge (waist up) (3) IMS (Intensive Care Unit Mobility Scale; Intensive Care Unit Mobility Scale) I. Success rate of sitting on the bed II. Success rate of sitting on the edge (with or without caregiving) III. Success rate of bed-to-chair transfer (with or without caregiving) IV. Success rate of stepping at the bedside (alternately raising the foot with or without caregiving) V. Success rate of walking (walking at least 5 meters away from bed or chair) with the assistance of 2 or more people VI. Success rate of walking (walking at least 5 meters away from bed or chair) with one person's assistance VII. Walk independently with a walking aid (without human assistance, walk at least 5 meters away from the bed or chair with the walking aid. For wheelchair patients, 5 meters from the bed or chair. (You can operate the wheelchair and leave) success rate VIII. Success rate of walking independently without walking aids (walking at least 5 meters away from the bed or chair without human assistance and without walking aids) (4) MMT (Manual Muscle Testing) (5) Pain score: NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) (6) Pain score: VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)

Contacts

Public ContactZhuan Jin

Kameda Medical Center

jin.zhuan@kameda.jp+81-470922211

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026