Comparing performance of i-gel Plus and AuraGain for fiberoptic intubation

Comparing performance of i-gel Plus and AuraGain for fiberoptic intubation in cervical surgery: A randomized controlled study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-jRCT1012230035

Enrollment

106

Registered

2023-08-28

Start date

2023-08-28

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

General anesthesia General anesthesia

Interventions

i-gel Plus or AuraGain are inserted after induction of general anesthesia according to randomization. Tracheal intubation with fiberscope is performed using supraglottic airway device as a guide.

D007442

Tracheal intubation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who undergo cervical surgery under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who undergo airway management without tracheal intubation, who have tooth mobility and whose BMI > 40

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Time needed for the success of tracheal intubation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Time needed for the visual confirmation of vocal folds and tracheal bifurcation, fiberoptic view of vocal cords, difficulty intubation score	—

Contacts

Public ContactTomohiro Chaki

Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Hospital

chakitomohiro0728@yahoo.co.jp+81-11-611-2111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026